https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 Is fidelity to a complex behaviour change intervention associated with patient outcomes? Exploring the relationship between dietitian adherence and competence and the nutritional status of intervention patients https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:47252 Wed 28 Feb 2024 14:49:22 AEDT ]]> Metabolic, health and lifestyle profiling of breast cancer radiotherapy patients and the risk of developing fatigue https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17019 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:14:52 AEST ]]> Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy With Weekly Cisplatin or Cetuximab in Low-Risk HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer (TROG 12.01) – A Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:48759 10 pack years and/or distant metastases). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive radiation therapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions) with either weekly cisplatin, 7 doses of 40 mg/m2, or cetuximab, loading dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by 7 weekly doses of 250 mg/m2. The primary outcome was symptom severity assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck Symptom Severity Scale from baseline to 13 weeks postcompletion of radiation therapy using the area under the curve. Trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01855451. Results: Between June 17, 2013, and June 7, 2018, 189 patients were enrolled, with 92 in cisplatin arm and 90 in cetuximab included in the main analysis. There was no difference in the primary endpoint of symptom severity; difference in area under the curve cetuximab-cisplatin was 0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.19, 0.30), P = .66. The T-score (mean number of ≥grade 3 acute adverse events) was 4.35 (standard deviation 2.48) in the cisplatin arm and 3.82 (standard deviation 1.8) in the cetuximab arm, P = .108. The 3-year failure-free survival rates were 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%) in the cisplatin arm and 80% (95% CI, 70%-87%) in the cetuximab arm (hazard ratio = 3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-7.7]); P = .015. Conclusions: For patients with low-risk HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer, radiation therapy and cetuximab had inferior failure-free survival without improvement in symptom burden or toxicity compared with radiation therapy and weekly cisplatin. Radiation therapy and cisplatin remain the standard of care.]]> Wed 05 Apr 2023 13:48:31 AEST ]]> Patient-Reported Symptom Severity, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Emotional Distress Trajectories During and After Radiation Therapy for Human Papillomavirus–Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer: A TROG 12.01 Secondary Analysis https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:55237 Wed 01 May 2024 15:42:40 AEST ]]> Validation of local p16 testing for determination of human papilloma virus status eligibility on a low risk oropharyngeal cancer trial - A Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:42709 Thu 01 Sep 2022 10:02:26 AEST ]]> Altered amino acid homeostasis and the development of fatigue by breast cancer radiotherapy patients: a pilot study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:12356 Sat 24 Mar 2018 08:18:31 AEDT ]]> Treatment-related morbidity in prostate cancer: a comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with and without image guidance using implanted fiducial markers https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:20180 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:51:39 AEDT ]]>